Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured audit skill with a clear process, explicit validation checkpoint, and well-signaled external references; the main gap is that audit steps are guidance rather than executable code.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout; no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every section earns its tokens. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete audit checks and an executable validation command, but the audit process steps are guidance rather than copy-paste-ready code, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered process with an explicit validation checkpoint and a feedback loop ('if unavailable, state resource-risk remaining'). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections and one-level-deep references (AGENTS.md, playbook, default/locale resources); no bundle files, so the simple-skill exception applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |