Conciseness

The Quick Commands and Workflow sections are dense and earn their tokens, but the two anti-patterns on empty lists and `blocked-by` lifecycles spend roughly 50 lines explaining downstream `context-ready.sh` semantics that could be tightened or moved to a reference. Mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation — anchor 3, above anchor 2 because there is no filler or explanation of concepts Claude already knows.

Actionability

Six copy-paste-ready bash commands cover the common cases (tags, related links, blocked-by, heredoc body, dry-run, new typology), each paired with an explicit "Expected result" line so success is checkable. Fully executable with specific examples — anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

The four-step workflow carries an explicit checkpoint on every step: a duplicate check with expected output (step 2), "Verify: the printed path uses the expected typology plus date" (step 3), and "Stop if" guards on steps 1 and 4. Not anchor 4 because no checkpoint is merely implicit or missing; the file-creation operation is low-risk so the absence of an explicit fix-and-retry loop is not a gap.

Progressive Disclosure

The References section lists typologies.md, cli.md, and the frontmatter JSON schema, each with a "load when…" signal; all three files exist in the bundle and are one level deep with no chained references, and the bulk material (full CLI table, typology catalog, schema) correctly lives outside the body. Clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references — anchor 5.

Specificity

"Creates a structured, date-stamped context file filed by typology (findings, plans, goals, evidence, guides, follow-ups, merge-requests, tickets, decisions, notes, research) with YAML frontmatter" names the domain and specifies the concrete artifact shape with the full typology enumeration. It centers on a single action rather than listing several distinct actions, so it sits just below the comprehensive anchor 5.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Creates a structured, date-stamped context file filed by typology … with YAML frontmatter") and when ("Use when saving a finding, writing a plan, … plus ticket write-ups") with concrete trigger phrases, matching anchor 5. Not anchor 4 because the when-clause is explicit and enumerates specific triggers rather than being merely adequate.

Trigger Term Quality

The use-when clause surfaces many natural phrasings ("saving a finding", "writing a plan", "capturing a guide", "recording a decision", "logging a follow-up", "filing a merge-request note"), but omits natural triggers for `notes` and `research` despite listing them as typologies, and includes no file or directory terms. Good coverage with a few natural terms missing — anchor 4, not anchor 5's comprehensive synonym/extension coverage.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The typology enumeration carves a clear niche around persisted context files with minimal overlap risk, though generic requests like "create a plan" or "write this up" could pull in broader planning or documentation skills. Mostly distinct with minor overlap — anchor 4 rather than 5.