Name: desc-1025
Rating: 24 (1 reviews)
Author: pantheon-org

desc-1025

Boundary description with a multibyte glyph aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa😀

Quality

13%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./crates/skill-validator-rs/tests/golden-corpus/fixtures/boundary/desc-1025/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is desc-1024 in pantheon-org/tekhne

Quality

Content

26%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is two content-free lines: a placeholder heading and the instruction 'Use the tool.' While it wastes no tokens (conciseness), it is entirely non-actionable, has no discernible workflow, and offers no structure or references. The body needs actual instructions — specific commands or code, an ordered procedure with validation if applicable, and meaningful section headings.

Suggestions

Replace 'Use the tool.' with concrete, executable guidance: name the specific tool/command to run and show a copy-paste-ready example covering the common case.

Give the skill real structure: replace the '# Body' placeholder with headings that reflect actual tasks (e.g. a quick-start section plus clearly signaled references if detail is needed).

If the task involves multiple or risky steps, list them as an ordered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints so the workflow is unambiguous.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body ('# Body' / 'Use the tool.') has no padding and no over-explanation, but the vacuous heading and the content-free instruction mean the few tokens present do not fully earn their place, so it sits just below the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor.	4 / 5
Actionability	'Use the tool.' offers no concrete code, commands, or specifics and does not even identify which tool, matching the 'entirely vague or abstract; no concrete guidance' anchor.	1 / 5
Workflow Clarity	There are no steps or sequence, and the single action is ambiguous about both the tool and the task, so the simple-skill exception (score 5 only for an unambiguous single action) does not apply; this matches the 'steps missing or incoherent' anchor.	1 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The only heading is the meaningless '# Body' with no organized sections, no references, and no navigation; this is minimal structure rather than the genuine organization required for the anchor above.	2 / 5
	Total	8 / 20 Passed

Description

0%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a boundary/edge-case artifact: a meta sentence about itself followed by padding characters and an emoji glyph. It provides no capabilities, no trigger terms, and no usage conditions, scoring at the floor on every dimension. It must be rewritten entirely to state what the skill does and when to use it.

Suggestions

Replace the filler text with a statement of concrete capabilities, e.g. 'Extract text and tables from X files, fill forms, merge documents', using third-person action verbs.

Add an explicit trigger clause such as 'Use when the user mentions <domain>, <file extension>, or <task>' so both what and when are answered.

Include the natural keywords, synonyms, and file extensions users would actually say when they need this skill, and remove the repeated padding characters and emoji.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description is 'Boundary description with a multibyte glyph' followed by hundreds of repeated 'a' characters; it names no domain and no concrete actions, using pure meta-language about the description itself, matching the 'entirely vague; no concrete actions' anchor.	1 / 5
Completeness	Neither a 'what' nor a 'when' is present, and there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, matching the 'missing both what and when' anchor.	1 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	It contains no natural keywords a user would say — only filler characters and the phrase 'multibyte glyph', which is technical meta-jargon unrelated to any skill purpose, matching the 'no natural keywords' anchor.	1 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The text conveys no information that could distinguish this skill from any other, so it is entirely generic with maximal conflict risk, matching the lowest anchor.	1 / 5
	Total	4 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: pantheon-org/tekhne
Path: crates/skill-validator-rs/tests/golden-corpus/fixtures/boundary/desc-1025/SKILL.md
Commit: a1083f4

Reviewed: 2 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.