CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

goal-tracker

Record a session goal as a dated file with items plus evidence, keep its status current, then answer "what's left" in under 100 words: achieved, parked, still open. Use when the user states a session goal, asks what's left, what's outstanding, what's still open, whether the goal is met, are we done, where the session got to. Also use to park an item, to promote an overgrown goal into a plan, to close a goal out.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tightly written, highly actionable skill: executable script commands with expected output, explicit validation gates with error recovery, and an exemplary references table with per-reference when-to-use and skip conditions. The only trimmable content is the mildly rhetorical intro and Mindset framing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and directive with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows, but the framing intro ('Write down the one thing this session is for, keep it honest as work lands') and the rhetorical 'Mindset' section ('Trade convenience for provability everywhere') could be trimmed without losing guidance, fitting the efficient-with-minor-trimming anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands — `./scripts/goal.sh new "..."`, `park 3 "..."`, `status`, `check` — with verbatim console output, concrete YAML status fields, and a BAD/GOOD evidence table covering the common cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The sequence (clarity test → record → set goal-status → evidence → park → summary → promote → close) is clear and gated by explicit validation ('Close out only when `check` exits zero'), includes an error-recovery example with a FAILED message and exit code, and ends with a verification checklist.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The ~130-line overview keeps detail in five real bundle files (all verified present), surfaced through a References table that gives each one a 'When to Use' and a skip condition; references are one level deep with only benign sibling cross-links, making navigation easy.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: concrete lifecycle actions, third-person voice, and an unusually rich set of natural trigger phrases with synonyms. The only weakness is minor overlap risk with planning/task-management skills on the broader goal-stating triggers.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists multiple concrete actions covering the full lifecycle — 'Record a session goal as a dated file with items plus evidence, keep its status current, then answer "what's left" in under 100 words', plus 'park an item, to promote an overgrown goal into a plan, to close a goal out' — with no gaps in coverage, matching the comprehensive-actions anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both 'what' (record, keep status current, answer in under 100 words with achieved/parked/still open) and 'when' are explicitly answered with an explicit 'Use when' clause listing concrete trigger phrases plus an 'Also use to' clause for lifecycle operations.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It enumerates many natural user phrasings with synonyms — 'what's left, what's outstanding, what's still open, whether the goal is met, are we done, where the session got to' — exactly the variations a user would naturally say when needing this skill.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Session-goal tracking is a clear niche with distinctive 'what's left / are we done' triggers, but 'the user states a session goal' and 'close a goal out' carry minor overlap risk with closely related planning and task-management skills, fitting the mostly-distinct anchor rather than the minimal-conflict one.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

relative_links

Relative link issues: 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 deeper-than-1-level

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
pantheon-org/tekhne
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.