Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-validated configuration skill with excellent executable templates and a clear workflow. Its weaknesses are trimmable redundancy (a duplicated TOC section and repeated commands) and broken/ill-formed reference links in the otherwise good progressive-disclosure structure.
Suggestions
Remove the 'Information Architecture' section (it restates the headings already visible in the document) and delete the 'Quick Commands' section or the inline Workflow commands so each command appears once.
Fix or remove the broken evals/scenario-0..2/task.md links — no evals/ directory exists in the bundle.
Add a blank line between the 'OpenCode Docs' external link and the references table so the table renders correctly, and consider converting the bare link into a labeled bullet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly dense and actionable, but the "Information Architecture" section merely restates the table of contents and "Quick Commands" repeats commands already embedded in the Workflow (jq, rg, opencode run all appear twice). Fits the 3 anchor ("could be tightened"); not 4 because this section-level redundancy exceeds minor over-explanation. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready opencode.json and AGENTS.md templates plus concrete bash validation commands (jq . opencode.json, rg -n ..., opencode run "test") fully cover the common cases. Matches the 5 anchor for executable, copy-paste-ready guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step Workflow includes explicit validation checkpoints (jq syntax check, rg sanity grep, smoke test) and error-recovery direction ("If errors surface, re-read config precedence before widening permissions"). Matches the 5 anchor; not 4 because no validation checkpoint is missing. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good hub structure with three real, one-level-deep references clearly signaled in a topic table. Not 5 because the three evals/scenario-*.md links point to nonexistent files and the external docs link sits directly above the reference table without a blank line, breaking its markdown rendering. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |