CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

retrospect-domain

Analyze domain insights (WHAT/WHY learned) from captured sessions. Use when reviewing learnings, extracting patterns, analyzing decisions. Triggers include "retrospect domain", "domain analysis", "what did I learn", "session insights".

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/specialized/retrospect-domain/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear sequenced workflow, executable commands, and a properly signaled one-level-deep reference bundle. Its main weakness is token efficiency: Principles, the report format, and the configurable-path notes are duplicated between SKILL.md and reference.md.

Suggestions

Remove the 'Principles' section (or reduce it to a one-line pointer) — it duplicates the 'Key Principles' section of references/reference.md nearly verbatim and costs context on every load.

Replace the inline 'Report Section Format' skeleton with a pointer to the report template in references/reference.md, keeping only the output filename convention inline.

State the project-configurable output/frameworks path once (e.g. in a single 'Configuration' note) instead of repeating the caveat across Principles, Steps, and Gotchas.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient, but the 'Principles' section duplicates the reference file's 'Key Principles' nearly verbatim, 'Report Section Format' repeats the reference's report template in skeleton form, and the project-configurable-path note is stated three times. It is above anchor 2 (no pervasive padding) but below anchor 4 because this duplication is more than a minor trim.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete executable guidance throughout: 'bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/retrospect-load-sessions.sh $@' with a parse contract ('First line: PERIOD: YYYY-MM-DD_to_YYYY-MM-DD'), a concrete output path example, and four ready-to-run usage examples. Minor gaps (e.g. the zero-sessions guard sits in 'When Not to Use' rather than as a checkpoint in the workflow) keep it below fully copy-paste-complete anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit fallback checkpoint in step 1 ('If missing: warn, use generic framework') and a gotcha inviting direct testing of the loader ('Run the session loader directly to test it'). It is not a destructive or batch-modifying operation so the cap-at-3 rule does not apply; it misses anchor 5 because there is no validation step confirming the written report (e.g. verifying the output file exists or that sessions were actually found inside the workflow).

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Scored against the actual bundle: references/reference.md exists and the body's '[Reference](references/reference.md) — scoring rubrics, metric definitions, and report format' is one level deep and clearly signaled; domain frameworks correctly live in the reference with step 1 pointing to them. Minor gaps — the Principles list and report skeleton duplicate reference content inline — keep it below the well-split anchor 5.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that explicitly states what the skill does and when to use it, with natural trigger phrases. Its main weakness is that the capability verbs are generic variants of 'analyze' rather than distinct concrete actions, and the sibling-skill boundary is not drawn within the description itself.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

"Analyze domain insights (WHAT/WHY learned) from captured sessions" names the domain, but the action list ("reviewing learnings, extracting patterns, analyzing decisions") is all variants of 'analyze' and stays generic, matching the anchor for naming a domain with 1-2 concrete actions rather than the several-specific-actions anchors above.

3 / 5

Completeness

It clearly answers both what ("Analyze domain insights (WHAT/WHY learned) from captured sessions") and when ("Use when reviewing learnings, extracting patterns, analyzing decisions") with concrete trigger phrases, structurally matching the top anchor's exemplar. It is not the 4 anchor because the 'when' clause is already explicit and specific, not merely serviceable.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Explicit triggers "retrospect domain", "domain analysis", "what did I learn", "session insights" are natural phrases a user would say, but coverage lacks common synonyms (e.g. 'retrospective', 'lessons learned', 'takeaways'), so it fits 'good keyword coverage; a few natural terms missing' rather than comprehensive coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Niche triggers like "retrospect domain" and "domain insights" form a clear niche, but the description itself does not distinguish the sibling retrospect-collab skill (that contrast exists only in the body) and "analyzing decisions" is broad, matching 'mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills'.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository

pantheon-org/tekhne

Path

skills/specialized/retrospect-domain/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.