CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

retrospect-domain

Analyze domain insights (WHAT/WHY learned) from captured sessions. Use when reviewing learnings, extracting patterns, analyzing decisions. Triggers include "retrospect domain", "domain analysis", "what did I learn", "session insights".

66

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable skill body with clean progressive disclosure and a clearly sequenced workflow including fallback handling. The main gaps are a vague session-reading step, minor redundancy between the inline report skeleton and the reference template, and the absence of any output verification step.

Suggestions

Make Step 3 concrete: specify how session files are located and parsed (e.g., expected file format, which fields to extract, or a command) instead of the vague "extract conversation turns, tools used, git context".

Trim the repeated "project-configurable" caveats to a single note and drop the inline report skeleton in favor of the full template already in references/reference.md to reduce token cost.

Add a lightweight verification step after Step 6, such as re-reading the written insight file to confirm the PERIOD in the filename matches the parsed session window.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes competence, with only minor trimmable redundancy: the report skeleton overlaps the full template in references/reference.md, and the "project-configurable" path caveat is repeated three times across Steps 1, 2, and 6.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides mostly executable guidance (the session-loader bash command, concrete output path example, and four runnable /retrospect invocations), but Step 3 ("Read session files — extract conversation turns, tools used, git context") gives no specifics on how to parse them.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Seven clearly sequenced steps with an explicit fallback checkpoint (missing domain framework → warn and use generic) and a gotcha advising testing the loader; a validation loop on the generated report is absent, though this non-destructive analysis skill does not require one.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clear overview with a single well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/reference.md, verified to exist) that appropriately holds the domain frameworks and the full report template, making navigation easy.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states what the skill does and when to use it, backed by natural trigger phrases. It is slightly held back by abstract action wording and a generic trigger ("session insights") that could collide with the collaboration-retrospect sibling skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete actions ("reviewing learnings, extracting patterns, analyzing decisions") beyond just naming the domain, but the actions remain somewhat abstract compared to the fully concrete enumerations of the top anchor.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers what ("Analyze domain insights (WHAT/WHY learned) from captured sessions") and when ("Use when reviewing learnings..." plus concrete trigger phrases), matching the top anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say ("what did I learn", "session insights", "domain analysis") with good coverage, though common synonyms like "lessons learned" or "retrospective" are missing, keeping it below the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "retrospect domain" niche is mostly distinct, but the generic trigger "session insights" overlaps with the sibling retrospect-collab skill, giving minor conflict risk with a closely related skill.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

allowed_tools_field

'allowed-tools' contains unusual tool name(s)

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
pantheon-org/tekhne
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.