Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable: concrete steps, copy-paste validation commands with expected outputs, a Definition of Done checklist, and error-recovery guidance for every failure mode. Its one weakness is verbosity -- the append-only and no-.context/-citation rules are each restated across several sections (schema, workflow, mindset, anti-patterns), which could be consolidated into a single authoritative statement.
Suggestions
Consolidate the append-only rule -- currently stated in the Row Schema table ('never reused or renumbered'), workflow step 4 ('Never insert out of # order, never renumber existing rows'), resolve step 3, the Mindset section, and two full Anti-Pattern blocks -- into the two Anti-Pattern entries and drop the restatements.
Fold the Mindset section's rationale into the relevant Anti-Pattern WHY clauses; the 'unenforced rule that's actually followed' paragraph restates what resolve step 3 and Anti-Pattern 2 already mandate.
Merge the .context/-citation prohibition, which appears in both workflow step 3 and Anti-Pattern 4, into a single anti-pattern with a one-line pointer from the workflow step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The append-only rule is restated across the Row Schema ('Permanent id, assigned once, never reused or renumbered'), workflow step 4 ('Never insert out of # order, never renumber existing rows'), resolve step 3 ('Never delete the row, never touch any column but Status/Date/Decision'), the Mindset section, and two full Anti-Pattern blocks; the .context/ citation prohibition likewise appears in both workflow step 3 and Anti-Pattern 4. Mostly efficient, but this cross-section repetition and the Mindset section's philosophical rationale ('An unenforced rule that's actually followed is worth more here than an enforced one that invites working around it') could be tightened. Not 4: the repetition spans multiple full sections, beyond 'minor instances'; not 2: each section is individually purposeful and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete, executable guidance: 'Read the current last row's # in docs/RISK_REGISTER.md; the new row's # is that value + 1', copy-paste commands (scripts/validate-risk-register-append-only.sh, scripts/validate-risk-register-schema.sh) with expected output specified ('nothing printed, exit code 0'), a precise per-column Row Schema table, and a troubleshooting table mapping each failure mode to a specific fix. The common cases (add, resolve, pre-commit rejection) are all covered with concrete instructions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Both add and resolve workflows are numbered with explicit validation checkpoints ('Run both validation scripts and confirm each prints no error output and exits 0 before committing'; 'Re-run scripts/validate-risk-register-schema.sh and confirm it passes now that all three cells moved together'), plus a Definition of Done checklist and a Troubleshooting section providing fix-and-retry feedback loops for pre-commit rejections. This matches the top anchor's validate -> fix -> re-validate pattern exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear operational overview; both referenced files (references/relationship-to-sibling-conventions.md, references/unresolved-verification-case-study.md) exist, are one level deep, and are surfaced in a References table annotated with 'When to Use'. The row template and JSON schema are appropriately split into assets/templates/ and assets/schemas/, and both scripts referenced in the body exist in scripts/. Not 4: navigation is unambiguous and no content that belongs in a bundle file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |