Content
30%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is token-efficient but substantively empty — it describes nothing the skill actually does and offers no executable guidance or workflow. The one reference link is correctly structured but points to a stub file, so progressive disclosure is present in form only.
Suggestions
State the skill's actual procedure concretely (steps, commands, or decision rules) instead of the meta sentence about demonstrating a valid skill.
If the skill has any multi-step or batch/destructive operation, add an explicit sequence with a validation checkpoint; otherwise at minimum describe the single task unambiguously.
Populate references/guide.md with the promised step-by-step instructions so the referenced path delivers content, and drop or replace the meta 'demonstrates a valid skill' sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is extremely lean with no padding or explanations of known concepts, but "This skill demonstrates a valid skill inside a multi-skill directory" is unnecessary meta-explanation that does not earn its tokens. It is not 5 because that sentence could be cut without losing anything, and not 3 because there is no verbosity beyond it. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body only describes the skill's purpose ("demonstrates a valid skill inside a multi-skill directory") and points to a reference 'for details'; it provides no concrete steps, commands, or guidance, matching the anchor 'Entirely vague or abstract; no concrete code or commands'. It cannot score 2 because not even high-level actionable hints are given. | 1 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | There are no steps or sequence of any kind in the body, matching the anchor 'Steps missing or incoherent; no sequence'. It does not score 2 because even a rough incomplete sequence is absent. | 1 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference "[reference guide](references/guide.md)" is clearly signaled, one level deep, and resolves to a real bundle file, but the split is superficial: the body has no overview content and references/guide.md is a near-empty stub ("Step-by-step instructions for skill-alpha." with no steps), so navigation leads nowhere. This fits 'some structure but could be better organized' rather than 4, whose referenced content actually carries the payload. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 9 / 20 Passed |