Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-sequenced workflow with executable commands for every platform and explicit validation gates and feedback loops. The main improvement areas are trimming the repetition in the Greptile freshness section and moving the duplicated GraphQL query into the existing reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by executable commands, tables, and terse bullets with almost no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimming opportunities exist: section 4 restates the Greptile freshness rule in code, comments, and prose, and section 9 inlines a GraphQL query that duplicates references/graphql-queries.md. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every step provides copy-paste-ready commands: real gh/glab/git/p4 invocations with actual flags, jq filters, GraphQL queries, and pagination handling covering all three platforms. Placeholders like <PR_NUMBER> are standard and clearly marked. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0-10 are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints: poll checks to a terminal state before analysis (section 3), a hard Greptile head-SHA freshness gate with exit conditions (section 4), and an explicit feedback loop ('Address the findings, push, and re-run Greptile until it concludes success'). The reporting table and categorized issue types add a checklist quality. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both referenced bundle files (references/graphql-queries.md and references/gitlab-api.md) exist and are well-signaled at their point of use, one level deep. Some content that could live in a separate file is inlined — the ~90-line Greptile gating scripts and the section 9 GraphQL query that duplicates the reference file — which keeps it below clean-split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |