Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, well-sequenced procedure with strong validation and an explicit feedback loop. Its main gaps are minor: a couple of redundant restatements and the missing exact `gh pr create` command.
Suggestions
Give the concrete PR-creation command (e.g. `gh pr create --base master ...`) rather than only naming `gh`.
Remove the ALL-CAPS duplicate of the Greptile-5/5 instruction at the end of §5 and de-duplicate the Hard rules against §1 and §4 to tighten conciseness.
Consider condensing the ~85-line body or splitting the Guardrails detail so the procedure reads closer to the under-50-line ideal for progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean bullet structure with concrete commands that assume Claude's competence; minor redundancy in the ALL-CAPS repeat at the end of §5 and the Hard rules restating §1/§4 could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides exact commands (`git rev-parse --git-dir`, `git branch --show-current`), the exact Co-Authored-By trailer, and the CONTRIBUTING.md URL, but leaves the PR-creation step as 'open the PR with `gh`' without the specific `gh pr create` invocation. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 0–6 sequence with an explicit Guardrails checklist, validation checkpoints (re-verify after rebase, prcheckloop), and a Greptile feedback loop (review → fix → push → repeat until 5/5, max 20 turns). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (CONTRIBUTING.md, /greploop, /prcheckloop); at ~85 lines it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception, keeping it just short of a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |