Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable instruction-only skill: unambiguous sequencing, explicit validation checklist for a batch operation, exact output formats, and named tools. The only notable gap is the referenced-but-unshown wiki frontmatter schema.
Suggestions
Include a minimal example frontmatter block for a source page (or point to a real schema file) so step 4's 'frontmatter per the wiki schema' is executable without guessing.
Show one filled-in example of a contradiction callout (with a real date and slug) next to the 'YYYY-MM-DD' placeholder to remove ambiguity about placement within the older page.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line instructs — file paths, formats, tool names — with zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows ('Terse, factual, neutral' is itself practiced, not just preached). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout: exact paths ('wiki/sources/<slug>.md'), a copy-paste log entry template, the exact contradiction callout format, and named tools. Not 5 because 'frontmatter per the wiki schema' never shows or links the schema, leaving a key detail unexecutable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Nine clearly sequenced steps plus an explicit pre-close verification checklist covering this 5–15-page batch operation, including contradiction handling ('append a > ⚠ contradicted by... callout') rather than silent overwrite. Not 4 because the checklist supplies the validation checkpoint the 4 anchor leaves implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-file skill (~50-line body) with no bundle files; sections (Inputs, Workflow, Voice, Verification, Tools) are well-organized and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |