Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary read-only audit skill: lean, highly actionable, with a well-sequenced workflow and a verification checklist, all in a single self-contained well-organized file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, instruction-only body with no padding about what a wiki is; every section (Inputs, Workflow, Voice, Verification, Tools) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence, matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor; not 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to tighten. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance throughout: named tools, a quantified threshold ('a term appears on three or more pages'), exact severity groupings, and a copy-paste log-entry template — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill; not 2 because nothing is pseudocode or missing key details. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 5-step sequence capped by an explicit Verification checklist; the destructive/batch feedback-loop cap does not apply because lint is read-only by design, and the checklist provides the validation checkpoint the anchor 3 expects. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, self-contained skill organized into clearly delineated sections with no nested or multi-level references; per the simple-skills note, a compact well-sectioned skill with no need for external files can score 3 on organization alone; not 2 because nothing that should be separate is left inline and references are not poorly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |