Conciseness

The body is lean and operational throughout — 'Audit, do not edit. Return findings the maintainer (human or agent) can triage.' sets the contract in one line, and no section explains concepts Claude already knows. Matches the 5 anchor (every token earns its place); not 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim.

Actionability

Guidance is fully executable for an instruction-only skill: concrete decision rules ('a term appears on three or more pages but has no dedicated wiki/concepts/<slug>.md'), a specified per-item output format (path, evidence, suggested fix, follow-up operation), a copy-paste log entry template, and named tools with required parameters ('always passing the operation issue's wikiId and spaceSlug'). Matches the 5 anchor; not 4 because the common cases are concretely specified.

Workflow Clarity

A clear 5-step sequence (walk index → check seven issues in order → triage list → do not write → log entry) with an explicit guardrail ('Do not write to wiki/. Lint is read-only by design') and a Verification checklist before closing the issue. Matches the 5 anchor with explicit validation steps and a checklist; the destructive-operation cap does not apply since the skill is read-only.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a self-contained ~54-line single-purpose audit with well-organized sections (Inputs, Workflow, Voice, Verification, Tools) and no bundle files. Per the simple-skill exception, this matches the 5 anchor: nothing here belongs in a separate reference file, and navigation within the body is trivial.

Specificity

The description enumerates concrete audit actions — 'contradictions, orphans, weak provenance, broken links, missing concept pages, and index/log drift' — plus a concrete output mode ('return triage findings without auto-fixing'). This matches the 5 anchor (multiple specific concrete actions, comprehensive coverage); it is not 4 because there are no significant gaps in the action list.

Completeness

It explicitly answers 'when' ('Use when an LLM Wiki operation issue is a lint or health check') and 'what' (audit for seven named issue classes, return triage findings without auto-fixing) with concrete trigger phrasing. This matches the 5 anchor exactly; not 4 because both what and when are explicit and specific.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms present include 'lint', 'health check', 'audit', 'contradictions', 'orphans', 'broken links', and 'triage' — good coverage with synonyms (lint/health check/audit). It falls short of the 5 anchor because a few phrases a user would naturally say are missing (e.g., 'stale pages', 'consistency check', 'cleanup'), though it is above the 3 anchor since several relevant natural keywords are covered.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The trigger is tightly scoped to 'an LLM Wiki operation issue' that 'is a lint or health check' — a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal overlap risk with other skills. Matches the 5 anchor; not 4 because it would not plausibly fire for a non-wiki skill.