Names the domain (C-suite/VP resumes) and one action (create), with a qualifier (emphasizing strategic leadership), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions like formatting, tailoring to industries, writing achievement bullets, etc.

Describes what it does (create executive resumes) but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 2, and the 'what' itself is thin enough to warrant a 1.

Includes some relevant keywords like 'C-suite', 'VP', 'resumes', and 'strategic leadership', but misses common variations users might say such as 'executive resume', 'CEO resume', 'senior leadership CV', 'career document', or specific titles like CFO, CTO, COO.

The C-suite/VP focus provides some distinctiveness from a general resume skill, but could still overlap with broader resume-writing or career document skills since the boundaries aren't sharply defined.

Extremely verbose at ~300+ lines. Much of the content explains resume-writing philosophy and concepts Claude already understands (e.g., what makes executive resumes different from standard resumes, what confidential information means). The comparison table, tone guidance, and 'executive search considerations' section are largely common knowledge for an LLM.

Provides concrete examples and templates (executive profile format, bullet formula, experience section format), which is helpful. However, these are illustrative examples rather than executable code/commands, and the guidance remains somewhat generic—it describes what good executive resumes look like rather than giving precise, step-by-step instructions for constructing one from user input.

The recommended sections list provides a clear sequence, and the output format gives structure. However, there's no explicit workflow for gathering information from the user, no validation checkpoints (e.g., 'confirm metrics with user before finalizing'), and no feedback loop for iterating on the resume. For a multi-step creative process, the lack of a clear process flow is a gap.

All content is in a single monolithic file with no references to supporting files. The extensive examples, tone guidance, and philosophical content could easily be split into separate reference files. The skill is a wall of text that dumps everything at once rather than providing a concise overview with pointers to detailed materials.