CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

impeccable

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

69

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tightly written, well-structured orchestration body with concrete commands, clear routing, and an explicit bounded-pass validation loop. Its main weakness is that nearly all detailed guidance is deferred to reference/*.md files that are absent from the delivered bundle, breaking progressive disclosure and leaving per-command actionability and workflow detail unreachable.

Suggestions

Ship the reference/ directory referenced by the command table and inline links (or inline the most critical guidance, e.g. craft-floor.md's bans and routing.md's menu, so the skill is self-sufficient).

Trim the motivational opener ("earns to be called out-of-distribution craft", "award-winning design director with impeccable understanding") to leaner POV framing that still sets the boldness bar.

For the highest-traffic commands (shape, critique/audit, polish), inline a one-line concrete first step before deferring to the reference, so actionability does not depend solely on files that may be missing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense and directive with no padding about concepts Claude already knows, but the motivational opener ("design that earns to be called out-of-distribution craft", "award-winning design director with impeccable understanding") is stylistic flourish that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable command syntax ("<skill-base-dir>/scripts/impeccable context", the .cmd Windows fallback, "impeccable pin <pin|unpin> <command>", "/impeccable hooks <on|off|status|...>", "/impeccable doctor") and explicit routing branches, but the per-command executable detail is deferred to reference files that are not present in the bundle.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Setup is a clear numbered sequence and the verify cycle has an explicit validation checkpoint with feedback loop and stop condition ("inspect once with a batched round… fix everything… confirm with at most one more round, and stop"), so the batch-operation cap is not triggered; minor gaps come from per-command workflows living in absent references.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-structured hub with ~30 clearly-signaled, one-level-deep markdown links (command table plus inline links), but the bundle ships no reference/ directory — none of the referenced files exist — so navigation leads to dead ends and the detail layer is unreachable.

3 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: third-person voice, concrete action verbs, explicit "Use when…" triggers with synonyms, and a negative scope boundary that sharply lowers conflict risk. It answers what, when, and what-not comprehensively without padding.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists many concrete actions — "design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract" — across a comprehensive set of frontend domains, matching the anchor for multiple specific concrete actions with comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly states both what (the verb list plus "Covers…" / "Handles…" domain lists) and when ("Use when the user wants to…" plus "Also use for…" concrete trigger phrases), with a negative boundary ("Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks").

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural user phrasings and their synonyms — "bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful", "loud designs that should become quieter", "live browser iteration on UI elements", "audit", "polish" — giving comprehensive coverage of terms users would actually say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear frontend-UI-design niche with distinct verb triggers, and the explicit "Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks" boundary minimizes conflict with adjacent skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

relative_links

Relative link issues: 34 missing

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
pbakaus/impeccable
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.