Conciseness

Every sentence carries API facts — parameter requirements, defaults ("Agent-scoped create_agent defaults notifyOnFinish to true"), and semantics ("Bare main prefers local main when it exists, otherwise origin/main") — with zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (cron, worktrees, MCP are never defined). Matches anchor 5: lean, assumes competence, every token earns its place.

Actionability

CLI blocks are copy-paste ready ("paseo workspace create --isolation worktree --mode branch-off --new-branch fix-x --base origin/main") and every MCP tool lists exact required and optional parameters plus return shape ("Returns { agentId, workspaceId, … }"). Matches anchor 5: fully executable guidance covering the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

The agent-launch flow is well sequenced ("Before choosing how to launch a delegated agent, call this tool and read every profile's notes" with an explicit fallback to provider discovery), but destructive operations — "paseo project delete <project-id>", "archive_workspace", "archive_agent" — are documented with no validation or confirmation step, invoking the destructive-operations cap at 3. Not 4 because checkpoints for the destructive commands are absent rather than a minor gap.

Progressive Disclosure

Clear per-domain sections (Projects, Workspaces, Agents, Schedules, CLI semantics) make the ~135-line body navigable, and product/setup/troubleshooting is properly deferred to the paseo-help skill. Not 5 because all CLI syntax and provider-discovery detail is inline with no reference-file split; not 3 because organization is strong and nothing is buried.

Specificity

The only action verb is the generic "managing projects, workspaces, workspace scripts, agents, schedules, and heartbeats" — the six nouns enumerate domain objects comprehensively but no concrete actions (create, archive, start/stop) are stated. Matches anchor 2 ("Names the domain but actions are minimal or generic") rather than 3, which requires 1-2 concrete action verbs.

Completeness

The "what" is clear ("Paseo reference for managing projects, workspaces, ... agents, schedules, and heartbeats") but the "when" is entirely absent — there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which caps completeness at 3 per the judging guidelines. Not 4 because the when-clause is missing outright, not merely implicit.

Trigger Term Quality

Keywords ("Paseo", "workspaces", "agents", "schedules", "heartbeats", "workspace scripts") are exactly the entity names a user of this product would say. Not 5 because natural terms the body covers — "terminals", "CLI", "MCP" — are absent along with any synonyms; not 3 because coverage spans all major entities rather than only some.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The "Paseo" product name anchors a clear, distinctive niche, so conflict risk is low overall. Not 5 because the generic entity words ("projects", "agents", "schedules") could match other agent-orchestration or scheduling skills when the user does not say "Paseo"; not 3 because the product branding keeps the niche distinct.