Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent instruction-only skill body: concrete commands, exact paths, a topology-first diagnostic sequence, and safety gates around state changes. Its only weaknesses are mild redundancy between the topology section and its implications list, and inlined reference-style detail (per-OS paths) that could live in bundle files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Nearly every token is Paseo-specific operational knowledge Claude cannot know (paths, topology rules, bundled CLI locations) with no explanation of general concepts, but the desktop-managed/standalone/Docker distinctions are restated in the "Apply later checks" bullets and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable guidance throughout: copy-paste commands ("paseo daemon status --json", "paseo provider diagnostic <provider> --json"), exact per-OS log and CLI paths, menu navigation ("Settings → your host → Overview → Full status"), and a concrete health-probe URL. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced triage workflow (docs → topology → read-only diagnosis → logs → escalate) with explicit checkpoints and gates: verify against current docs, probe only "when those values match the affected daemon", and no state changes "without the user's explicit permission", plus an evidence-collection fallback for unresolved cases. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; the body is well-sectioned and delegates detail to live docs one level deep (fetch the llms.txt index, then the owning .md page), but at ~88 lines the per-OS path and CLI tables are inlined in a single file rather than split into reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |