Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tightly written, highly actionable multi-phase workflow with explicit failure paths, validation checkpoints, and safety rails around committing, and it correctly delegates host-specific dispatch mechanics and upstream rationale. Its only weaknesses are minor: a few passages that could be trimmed or offloaded to a reference file.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence (host-dispatch mapping, exact paths, no basic-concept explanations), but minor passages could be trimmed, such as the diff-reflow justification for the no-hard-wrapping rule and the inline commit-convention discovery priority order in Phase 7. This fits anchor 4 ('minor instances of over-explanation') better than the lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete: the exact plan path pattern `plans/YYYY-MM-DD_slug.md`, literal `Dispatch(...)` blocks with agent, model, description, and prompt per pass, an explicit per-host tool mapping, and a concrete fallback commit message `docs(plans): add <slug>`. The Dispatch template's abstraction is explicitly justified by the Host notes, so it satisfies the executable-guidance anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Phases 1–7 are clearly sequenced with explicit checkpoints and feedback loops: the "PLAN TOO AMBIGUOUS TO BREAK DOWN" halt path stops before Phase 7, diligence findings are presented verbatim with a "REQUIRES YOUR JUDGMENT" bucket re-surfaced at the end, and the commit step has explicit validation rails (ask the user first, stage only the plan file, never `--no-verify`). This matches the anchor with explicit validation steps and error-recovery paths. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a well-sectioned workflow overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep References section pointing to workflow.md and design-decisions.md (no bundle files exist to check), but some detail such as the commit-convention discovery rules is inlined where it could live in a reference. This lands on anchor 4 ('good structure; minor organization gaps') rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |