Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, actionable ideation skill with a clear sequenced workflow and well-organized sections. The main improvement opportunity is trimming the Domain Context explanation and the 'Think step by step' filler.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Domain Context' paragraph to a single scope-stating sentence (e.g., 'This skill is for initial discovery — testing whether a new product should exist — not continuous discovery of a live product.') to avoid re-explaining a concept Claude already knows.
Remove the filler line 'Think step by step.' since Claude reasons through steps by default; keep the concrete output instruction ('Save substantial output as a markdown document').
The 'Further Reading' links are useful but could be flagged as optional so the core workflow stays the focus.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and well-organized, but the 'Domain Context' paragraph explaining Initial vs Continuous Discovery and the filler 'Think step by step' line could be tightened; not verbose enough for 1, but not fully lean for 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout: 'generate 5 specific feature ideas each' with named perspective focus areas, 'Prioritize the top 5 ideas' with explicit weighting criteria, and 'provide reasoning and key assumptions to test'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced four-step process (understand -> ideate -> prioritize -> reasoning/assumptions) with no ambiguity; this is an ideation skill so the destructive/batch validation requirement does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed, organized into clear sections (Context, Domain Context, Instructions, Further Reading) and only one-level external links, satisfying the simple-skill allowance for a 3. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |