prioritization-frameworks
Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work.
89
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly communicates what the skill provides (a reference guide with formulas, guidance, and templates for 9 prioritization frameworks) and when to use it (selecting, comparing, or learning about prioritization methods). It names specific frameworks as trigger terms, uses third-person voice, and occupies a distinct niche that minimizes conflict risk with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete deliverables: 'formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates' and names specific frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score). This goes beyond vague language and enumerates what the skill provides. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates') and when ('Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'prioritization frameworks', 'RICE', 'ICE', 'Kano', 'MoSCoW', 'Opportunity Score', 'RICE vs ICE', 'prioritization method', 'prioritization approaches'. These cover common user queries well including comparison patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche focused specifically on prioritization frameworks with named methods. Unlikely to conflict with other skills since it targets a very specific product management domain with explicit framework names as triggers. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-organized reference guide that efficiently covers 9 prioritization frameworks with clear formulas and a useful comparison table. Its main weakness is the lack of worked numerical examples showing how to apply the formulas, which would make it more actionable. The progressive disclosure and conciseness are strong, with appropriate use of external links for templates and deeper reading.
Suggestions
Add a worked numerical example for at least Opportunity Score and RICE/ICE (e.g., 'Given Importance=0.8, Satisfaction=0.3, Opportunity Score = 0.8 × (1 − 0.3) = 0.56') to make the formulas immediately actionable.
Add a brief decision workflow or decision tree for selecting the right framework (e.g., 'If prioritizing customer problems → Opportunity Score; If comparing initiatives quickly → ICE; If large team needing granularity → RICE').
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It presents formulas, tables, and key distinctions without explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place with specific formulas, comparisons, or actionable templates. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete formulas and a clear comparison table, which is good for a reference guide. However, it lacks executable examples — no code for calculating scores, no worked numerical examples showing how to apply the formulas with sample data. The guidance is specific but not fully 'copy-paste ready' in practice. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The frameworks are clearly described individually, and the comparison table helps with selection. However, there's no explicit workflow for choosing a framework (e.g., decision tree or step-by-step selection process), and no validation steps for verifying that a framework was applied correctly. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with a clear overview table, individual framework sections with just enough detail, and well-signaled external references (templates, further reading) that are all one level deep. The organization supports easy navigation and discovery. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- phuryn/pm-skills
- Commit
36ccefd
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.