prioritization-frameworks
Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, and more. Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work.
71
86%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong description that clearly communicates what the skill provides (a reference guide with formulas, guidance, and templates for 9 prioritization frameworks) and when to use it (selecting, comparing, or learning about prioritization methods). It names specific frameworks as trigger terms, uses third-person voice, and occupies a clear niche that minimizes conflict risk with other skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete deliverables: 'formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates' and names specific frameworks (RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score). This goes beyond vague language and enumerates what the skill provides. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Reference guide to 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, when-to-use guidance, and templates') and when ('Use when selecting a prioritization method, comparing frameworks like RICE vs ICE, or learning how different prioritization approaches work'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'prioritization frameworks', 'RICE', 'ICE', 'Kano', 'MoSCoW', 'Opportunity Score', 'RICE vs ICE', 'prioritization method', 'prioritization approaches'. These cover common user queries well including comparison patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche focused specifically on prioritization frameworks with named methods. Unlikely to conflict with other skills since it targets a very specific domain of product management prioritization methodology. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-organized reference guide that efficiently covers 9 prioritization frameworks with formulas, a comparison table, and external templates. Its main weakness is the lack of worked numerical examples showing how to actually apply the formulas (e.g., sample RICE calculation), which would make it more actionable. The progressive disclosure and conciseness are strong.
Suggestions
Add a brief worked numerical example for at least one framework (e.g., RICE: 'Reach=500, Impact=0.7, Confidence=80%, Effort=3 → Score = (500 × 0.7 × 0.8) / 3 = 93.3') to make the formulas immediately actionable.
Add a simple decision tree or 2-3 sentence selection guide at the top (e.g., 'Prioritizing customer problems? → Opportunity Score. Quick initiative triage? → ICE. Need granularity at scale? → RICE.') to improve workflow clarity for framework selection.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It presents formulas, tables, and key distinctions without explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. Every section earns its place with specific formulas, comparisons, or actionable templates. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete formulas and a clear comparison table, which is good for a reference guide. However, it lacks executable examples — no code for calculating scores, no worked numerical examples showing how to apply the formulas with sample data. The guidance is specific but not fully 'copy-paste ready' in practice. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The skill implicitly sequences from Opportunity Score → ICE → RICE and the overview table helps with framework selection, but there's no explicit workflow for choosing a framework (e.g., decision tree or step-by-step selection process). For a reference guide this is acceptable but could be clearer about when to move between frameworks. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-structured with clear sections, a summary table for quick scanning, and one-level-deep references to templates and further reading. The overview table serves as an excellent navigation aid, and external resources are clearly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- phuryn/pm-skills
- Commit
020ee82
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.