Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, single-purpose instructional skill with a clear sequenced process and explicit output criteria. Its main weakness is mild conceptual padding in the Domain Context section and a few process steps that stay at the abstract-direction level rather than fully concrete guidance.
Suggestions
Trim or remove the 'Domain Context' paragraph, which restates what a product vision is — knowledge Claude already has — to improve token efficiency.
Tighten process steps like 'Review provided company and product information' and 'Envision the ideal future state' into more concrete actions, e.g. 'List the core problem and the customer's desired outcome before drafting.'
Add a brief self-check step (e.g. 'Verify each drafted vision is one sentence, jargon-free, and balanced between ambition and credibility') to make the generative workflow more actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient, but the 'Domain Context' section ('A product vision answers: How can we inspire people...') explains a concept Claude already knows about product vision, which is mild padding. It is not at 3 because some tokens do not earn their place, and not at 1 because most of the content is tight and actionable. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present (6-step process, explicit output criteria of Inspiring/Achievable/Emotional, 3-5 variations, rationale), but several steps ('Review provided information', 'Envision the ideal future state') are abstract directions rather than fully concrete instructions. It is not at 3 because the steps are not copy-paste-ready concrete actions, and not at 1 because the output spec is specific. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 6-step Process is clearly sequenced with a drafting-then-selecting-then-rationale flow. Although there is no explicit validation checkpoint, the task is a low-risk generative one (not destructive/batch/XML), so the feedback-loop cap does not apply. It is not at 2 because the sequence is unambiguous and complete for this single-purpose task. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a simple, single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files, organized into clear sections (Metadata, Instructions, Input Requirements, Output, Process, Notes, Further Reading), so it qualifies for a top score per the simple-skills note. It is not at 2 because organization is clean and the Further Reading links are external URLs rather than nested internal references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |