CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

product-vision

Brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams and aligns stakeholders. Use when defining or refining a product vision, creating a vision statement, or aligning the team around a shared direction.

58

Quality

66%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./pm-product-strategy/skills/product-vision/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a solid description that clearly communicates both what the skill does and when to use it, with good trigger terms that users would naturally employ. Its main weaknesses are slightly abstract capability language (relying on adjectives like 'inspiring' and 'emotional' rather than concrete actions) and moderate overlap risk with other product strategy skills.

Suggestions

Add more concrete actions or deliverables, e.g., 'generates vision statements, creates vision canvases, defines success metrics' to improve specificity.

Differentiate from adjacent product strategy skills by explicitly noting what this skill does NOT cover, or by adding more distinctive trigger terms like 'north star', 'product purpose', or 'long-term product direction'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (product vision) and some actions ('brainstorm', 'defining or refining', 'creating a vision statement', 'aligning the team'), but the actions are somewhat abstract—'inspiring, achievable, and emotional' are more adjectives than concrete capabilities. It doesn't list specific deliverables or techniques.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (brainstorm an inspiring, achievable, and emotional product vision that motivates teams and aligns stakeholders) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering defining/refining a product vision, creating a vision statement, or aligning the team).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'product vision', 'vision statement', 'aligning stakeholders', 'shared direction', 'defining or refining a product vision'. These are terms a user would naturally use when seeking this kind of help.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

While 'product vision' and 'vision statement' are fairly specific, this could overlap with broader product strategy, roadmapping, or general brainstorming skills. The niche is reasonably clear but not entirely distinct from adjacent product management skills.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Implementation

50%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This skill provides a reasonable framework for product vision brainstorming but stays at a fairly abstract level. It lacks concrete examples of good vision statements (input/output pairs) that would make it truly actionable, and includes some unnecessary explanatory content that Claude already knows. The workflow is clear but would benefit from iteration/feedback steps and example outputs.

Suggestions

Add 2-3 concrete example vision statements with input context and output, showing what a good result looks like (e.g., 'For a fintech startup targeting underbanked populations: "A world where everyone has access to financial tools that build generational wealth"').

Remove the 'Domain Context' section or reduce it to one line — Claude already understands what a product vision is.

Replace the external 'Further Reading' links with actionable templates or frameworks that Claude can directly use during execution (e.g., a vision statement template or evaluation criteria checklist).

Add an explicit feedback/iteration step in the process, such as 'Present options to the user, gather feedback, and refine the strongest candidate.'

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill includes some unnecessary explanation (e.g., 'Domain Context' section explaining what a vision is, which Claude already knows). The 'Notes' section contains generic advice that a veteran product leader would already know. However, it's not excessively verbose.

2 / 3

Actionability

The process steps provide a reasonable sequence but remain fairly abstract — there are no concrete examples of vision statements, no templates, no before/after examples. For an instruction-only skill, the guidance could be much more specific (e.g., showing example inputs and example vision statement outputs).

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 6-step process is listed clearly, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops. For a brainstorming/creative task, there's no step for user review, iteration, or refinement based on feedback. The sequence is present but lacks explicit checkpoints.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The 'Further Reading' section references external links (not project files), which aren't useful for Claude during execution. The content is all inline in a single file, which is acceptable for this skill's length, but the external links add no actionable value and the structure could be tighter.

2 / 3

Total

8

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
phuryn/pm-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.