Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-structured instruction skill with concrete commands, explicit validation checkpoints, and clean sectioning. The only mild gap is the absence of exact gh command flags for copy-paste use.
Suggestions
Add one or two complete 'gh issue create'/'gh issue edit' command examples with the actual flags used for labels and body input to push actionability to fully copy-paste-ready.
Consider a short inline example of a 'Suggested labels: ...' comment and a /label comment so the label-permission fallback is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean, instruction-only content with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every line is an actionable rule that earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and label taxonomies are provided ('gh issue create', 'gh issue edit', '/label <label name>', 'severity/major'), but exact gh flag examples are absent, leaving minor gaps versus copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints ('review that file against the matching issue template before calling gh', 'diff the patched body against the current issue body') and a Quick Checks checklist, satisfying feedback-loop expectations for issue-editing operations. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized skill with clear sections (Overview, Workflow, Quick Checks) and no bundle files or nested references, matching the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |