Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable skill body with a clear workflow, real bundled script, and explicit output verification. Minor gaps in exemplified command variants and an explicit error-recovery loop keep actionability and workflow_clarity at 4.
Suggestions
Add a second short command example for the --factor (multiplier) case so the common 'enlarge by Nx' path is copy-paste ready, not just described.
Add an explicit 'If verification fails or artifacts appear, re-run with a larger --model-scale or reject the output' feedback loop to step 4.
Trim the historical RR880 note in Script Notes unless it guides a current decision, to tighten conciseness further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | A lean ~45-line body that assumes Claude's competence: concrete commands, targeted script notes, and guardrails with no padding of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-paste uv run command with real flags plus verification commands and a uv fallback, but only one full invocation example; the --factor and cover/contain variants are described in prose rather than exemplified. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered 1–4 sequence with an explicit verification checkpoint (step 4) and script self-verification, but lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop for failure cases. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with one real bundled script referenced by path and well-organized Workflow/Script Notes/Quality Rules sections at one level of depth. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |