Content
22%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill functions as a directory/index page rather than an actionable orchestration guide. While the navigation tables are well-structured, the skill body contains no concrete instructions, executable code, or detailed workflow for how to actually orchestrate app building. The usage example is illustrative but not instructive, and critical details about decision-making logic, agent coordination mechanics, and validation steps are entirely absent from the main file.
Suggestions
Add a concrete, step-by-step workflow section with explicit decision points (e.g., 'If user mentions auth → include Clerk; if mentions payments → include Stripe') and validation checkpoints between agent handoffs.
Include at least one fully worked example showing the actual commands or agent invocations used, not just a high-level outline of the process.
Remove the generic 'When to Use' and 'Limitations' boilerplate sections that add no skill-specific value.
Add a decision tree or concrete rules for project type detection and tech stack selection directly in the SKILL.md, rather than deferring everything to sub-files.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient with good use of tables for navigation, but the 'When to Use' and 'Limitations' sections are generic boilerplate that add no value. The selective reading rule header is slightly verbose but the tables themselves are lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides no executable code, no concrete commands, and no specific instructions for how to actually build an app. The usage example is a high-level description of a process rather than actionable steps. All real guidance is deferred to referenced files that aren't provided. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The usage example shows a numbered list but it's purely illustrative with no validation checkpoints, no error handling, no feedback loops, and no concrete steps. There's no actual workflow to follow—just a vague outline of what the process looks like. For an orchestrator that coordinates destructive/batch operations across multiple agents, this is insufficient. | 1 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The file references are well-organized in tables with clear 'When to Read' guidance, and templates are clearly listed. However, since no bundle files were provided, we can't verify the references exist. The main issue is that the SKILL.md itself contains almost no substantive content—it's essentially just a table of contents with no actionable overview content of its own. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |