Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, action-oriented body: concrete code skeletons, exact identifiers, and real file paths make the three core components (help dialog, accessible view, verbosity setting) directly implementable, and the checklist ties the sections together. The main gaps are minor: placeholder bodies in the secondary code pattern, some generic ARIA/keyboard explanation Claude already knows, and no separation of broadly-applicable §4–§7 guidance into reference files.
Suggestions
Complete the secondary code skeletons — replace the `/* … */` placeholder bodies in the alternative provider pattern and the undefined `getMyFeatureContent()` in the accessible-view example with minimal working implementations so all examples are copy-paste ready.
Trim §6 and §7 to the VS Code-specific requirements (e.g. `focusBorder` theming, `aria-setsize`/`aria-posinset` for virtualized lists) and drop generic ARIA/keyboard-navigation explanations Claude already knows.
Consider moving the broadly-applicable sections (§4 signals, §5 alerts vs. status, §6–§7 keyboard/ARIA requirements) into a reference file, keeping SKILL.md focused on the three required components and the checklist.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes competence — real file paths, exact enum names, registration calls — with every section task-oriented. It falls short of a 5 because §6 and §7 restate ARIA/keyboard fundamentals ("All interactive elements must be reachable via Tab", basic aria-label guidance) that Claude already knows, which is mild padding. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable: the primary help-dialog skeleton is near copy-paste ready with correct imports, and §3 shows the exact enum entry and configuration-property registration with real file paths. Minor gaps keep it below 5 — the accessible-view skeleton calls an undefined `getMyFeatureContent()`, and the alternative-provider pattern uses `/* … */` placeholder bodies. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | §1–§3 use clearly sequenced numbered steps (implement → create provider → register) and the closing "Checklist for Every New Feature" acts as an explicit verification checkpoint, plus a test-with-a-screen-reader step. It misses the anchor-5 feedback-loop pattern (validate → fix → retry), though this authoring task class does not demand a destructive-operation validation loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single SKILL.md is well organized: seven clearly titled sections, a summary checklist, and a "Key Files" map pointing to the relevant source files. It does not reach 5 because the ~300-line body inlines general §6–§7 guidance that could be split into a reference file, and there is no split between quick-start and advanced material. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |