Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, highly actionable, project-specific body that assumes Claude's competence and points outward to specs and sibling skills at one level of depth. Its main gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop for the validation steps it does cite.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense and assumes competence throughout (no explanations of what VS Code, MCP, or fixtures are), but a few spots could be trimmed — the long multi-line `@playwright/cli eval` snippets and the slight overlap between "Common layout issues" and "Fixture vs real product gaps" — so it sits just below the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable guidance throughout: exact file paths, fixture ID patterns, `defineComponentFixture` snippets, eslint-disable directives, and concrete commands (`./scripts/test.sh --grep ...`, `npm run typecheck-client && npm run valid-layers-check`), covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequences with most checkpoints present — the five-layer extension-API sync table acts as a checklist, and "verify both core and sessions registrations compile" plus the test/typecheck commands are explicit validations — but there is no described validate-fix-retry feedback loop for when a check fails, keeping it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections (Spec, Key Folders, Key Interfaces, Extension API, Testing, Debugging) with one-level-deep, clearly signaled outward references ("See spec for full field reference", "see the `component-fixtures` skill", "see the `sessions` skill", "see the **`launch` skill**"), making navigation easy with no nested-reference chains. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |