Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and well-sequenced with a built-in feedback loop, but its actionability and navigation suffer because the referenced template file (agents.md) is absent from the bundle. It reads as an overview that points to detail that is not actually shipped with the skill.
Suggestions
Inline a minimal .agent.md template (frontmatter fields + a one-section body example) so the skill is actionable even before agents.md is loaded.
Resolve the dangling reference: either ship agents.md under references/ or specify its exact path/location so navigation is not broken.
Add an explicit validation step in 'Iterate' (e.g., review the saved .agent.md against a template checklist) before declaring the agent finalized.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes Claude's competence, giving task steps without explaining concepts Claude already knows (e.g., what an agent is). It is not a 5 because the closing 'Remember to follow the agent-customization guidelines...' partially repeats the opening reference and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The sections list concrete steps (extract role/tool/scope, clarify, draft, ask, summarize) but the core actionable detail — the .agent.md template and format — is deferred to 'agents.md', which is not present in the bundle. This matches 'some concrete guidance but incomplete; missing key details' rather than the mostly-executable bar of a 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (Extract -> Clarify -> Iterate) is given with a feedback checkpoint ('Identify the most ambiguous or weak parts and ask about those'). It is not a 5 because there is no explicit validation step confirming the drafted agent meets a template before finalizing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and the reference to 'agents.md' is clearly signaled, but no bundle directory (references/) exists, so the referenced file is dangling and navigation breaks. This fits 'references present but not clearly signaled / content that should be separate is inline' more than the 'minor organization gaps' of a 4 because the primary reference target is missing. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |