Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of conciseness with a clear three-phase workflow and a built-in iteration checkpoint. Its main weaknesses are the dangling references to skills.md/agent-customization that are not part of this bundle, which both reduces actionability and slightly muddies navigation.
Suggestions
Bundle the template and principles currently delegated to 'skills.md' into a references/ file (or inline the essential template) so the skill is self-contained and the guidance is executable.
Make the external reference explicit and navigable, e.g., 'See [references/template.md](references/template.md)' instead of the unanchored 'follow skills.md'.
Add an explicit completion check before the finalize step (e.g., verify the SKILL.md has a description with what/when triggers) to close the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (under 30 lines), has no padding, and explains nothing Claude already knows; it even delegates template details to 'skills.md'. Every line directs behavior, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The guidance gives concrete questions ('Workspace-scoped or personal?', 'Quick checklist or full multi-step workflow?') and a draft-iterate loop, but the substantive template and principles are delegated to 'skills.md' and the 'agent-customization' guidelines, neither of which exists in this skill's bundle. This leaves key executable detail missing, matching the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor rather than the mostly-executable anchor at 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-phase sequence (Extract from Conversation -> Clarify if Needed -> Iterate) is clearly ordered, and 'Identify the most ambiguous or weak parts and ask about those' provides a feedback checkpoint. No destructive or batch operations apply, so the validation cap does not. It is not a 5 because the error-recovery path is implicit and there are no explicit completion checks for the drafted skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with well-organized sections, so per the simple-skill note a 5 is possible on structure alone. However, it points to 'skills.md' for the template and to the 'agent-customization' skill, and neither is present in the bundle (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories exist), leaving a dangling, poorly-located reference — matching 'good structure; minor organization gaps' rather than fully clear one-level-deep navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |