Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized architecture mental model that assumes competence and gives concrete, applicable directives for the common change types. It is instruction-only without executable code, which is appropriate for an architecture skill but caps actionability just below the top.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of Chromium/Electron/IPC basics), and explicitly declines to enumerate churning features; every section states a load-bearing idea. The minor rhetorical framing ("the one idea everything follows from") earns its place, so not below 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, applicable directives — "write a new contribution modeled on a sibling", "make it authoritative in the main BrowserView, emit a change event, then mirror", channels "registered in electron-main/app.ts" — but is instruction-only with no copy-paste code, capping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Common operations are clearly sequenced (new state: main-authoritative → emit → mirror → forward; new operation: define in main → thin proxy), and the layer/IPC rules are explicit. No destructive/batch cap applies, but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than called out, holding it at 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single well-sectioned overview file that deliberately points to the live "features/ and tools/ folders are the source of truth" as one-level-deep references; structure is clear and navigation is easy, and the overview itself is appropriately self-contained. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |