Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-architected router: it fixes the calling conventions, the critical 'look up the id before running it' rule, and error semantics, then hands off to twelve precisely targeted reference files with excellent read-when guidance. Weaknesses are minor: some repeated emphasis could be tightened and a single example invocation would make the calling convention concrete. This is a strong skill overall.
Suggestions
Add one minimal example invocation in 'Calling these commands' showing the id and positional args shape (and an omitted-args case), so the convention is concrete without loading a reference file.
Consolidate the repeated 'Read it **before**...' emphasis -- state the read-before-running rule once and keep only the area-specific anti-pattern notes in each reference entry.
Trim rhetorical padding such as 'the most expensive mistake available' and the duplicated file-picker warning between the body and the files.md/viewer.md blurbs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious, Positron-specific facts (argument conventions, disabled/not-found semantics, opaque internal ids) and assumes Claude's competence, but the "Read it **before**..." emphasis repeats six times and the file-picker warning is stated in the body and again in two reference blurbs, plus rhetorical padding like "the most expensive mistake available". Minor instances of over-explanation that could be trimmed, fitting the 4 anchor rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete directives are present ("passing the command's literal `id` exactly as written", "fill `args` positionally", "Omit `args` entirely", "Never invent an argument value") and the failure section gives exact error semantics. The minor gap keeping it below 5: no inline example of an actual invocation (id plus args shape) -- every executable specific is delegated to reference files, which is the right architecture for this skill but leaves the body without a copy-paste-ready sample. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (identify the area, read the relevant reference file before running, use its id and arguments, handle failures) is clear and both failure modes have explicit recovery guidance ("Report this plainly... rather than retrying or guessing at a workaround"). It falls short of the 5 anchor because the happy path is spread across prose sections rather than laid out as an explicit sequence with validation checkpoints; no destructive or batch operations apply, so the cap at 3 does not. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview with twelve well-signaled, one-level-deep references, each with specific "Read when" trigger guidance; all twelve files exist in references/ and cross-link only to sibling files, not nested chains. This matches the 5 anchor (clear overview, well-signaled references, easy navigation) exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |