Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality, tightly written procedural skill: executable commands, a gated multi-step workflow with explicit re-validation before the public push, and clean sectioning with no padding. It is appropriately self-contained for its scope.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and tight throughout; assumes Claude's competence and adds only non-obvious operational gotchas (e.g. pinning --repo to avoid fork-remote misresolution) rather than padding or explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable commands ('gh api ...', 'gh issue view ... --json', 'gh search prs ...', 'gh pr create --draft ...') plus concrete branch-naming, commit-staging, and ordered PR-body instructions. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequence (Preconditions → Fetch → Gate → Implement → Safety → Ship) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: re-run live gates 2–4 before any push, and run the new test both before and after the fix. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained, well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nested external references; nothing here belongs in a separate bundle file, so well-structured sections suffice. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |