Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is efficiently written and well-structured as an overview, but its guidance is more directional than executable and the workflow lacks explicit checkpoints. Referenced files are not included in the bundle, slightly weakening progressive disclosure.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 concrete, executable checks for the most common style-guide violations so the "apply" step is actionable rather than abstract.
Include a short validation checkpoint (e.g., "confirm the change still passes lint/typecheck after applying style-guide principles") to strengthen workflow clarity.
Either add the referenced contributor-docs/style.md and docs/component-prop-naming.md to the bundle or note that they live in the host repo so references resolve unambiguously.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; it states what to read and how to apply it with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names a concrete file to read ("contributor-docs/style.md") and a topic table, but the core directive ("apply the relevant style-guide principles") is abstract and lacks specific, executable checks or examples. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence is present (read style guide, apply principles, call out deviations, consult topic table), but checkpoints and validation are implicit and the steps are loosely defined. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is an overview with a clearly signaled one-level topic table and an external doc pointer, but the referenced files (contributor-docs/style.md, docs/component-prop-naming.md) are not present in any bundle directory. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |