Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured skill body that progressively discloses detail into real reference files and gives mostly executable guidance. The main gap is the absence of an explicit run-test/fix-failures feedback loop and a few patterns lacking runnable examples.
Suggestions
Add a short run-test feedback loop in the body or quick reference, e.g. 'pytest -x -> read failure -> fix -> rerun', to strengthen workflow clarity.
Add minimal runnable snippets for the most common patterns (pytest.raises, @pytest.mark.parametrize, mocker.patch) instead of listing them only in the table.
Clarify when to prefer unit/ vs integration/ directories in the routing table so users pick the right location without guessing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized into objective, principles, quick reference, routing, and dependencies; it assumes Claude's competence and contains no padding or explanations of basic concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides executable commands, a concrete directory structure, and a pattern/marker reference table, but several quick-reference patterns (e.g. pytest.raises, mocker.patch) are listed without runnable example snippets, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear routing table sequences the user to the right reference per task and a commands block covers common runs, but there are no explicit validation/feedback checkpoints for test runs (e.g. run tests -> read failures -> fix -> rerun), which keeps it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview in SKILL.md with a well-signaled routing table pointing one level deep to real reference files (fixtures.md, parametrization.md, mocking.md, patterns.md), all of which exist, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |