Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable, well-structured instruction/API skill that assumes competence and gives concrete commands plus a clear output contract. The only gap is a missing explicit error-recovery/verification checkpoint in the workflow.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification/error-recovery step to the workflow (e.g., what to do if an API call fails or a stack has no version field) to earn workflow_clarity 5.
Note the `totalStacks` field as a completeness check (compare it against the length of the `stacks` array) so results cannot silently drop stacks.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and self-contained: it never explains what Pulumi, stacks, packages, or versions are, and every section (API commands, response fields, workflow, output format, out-of-scope handoff) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready `pulumi api` commands with exact flags, enumerated response fields, a numbered workflow, and a concrete markdown-table output example — fully executable guidance covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The "Find outdated stacks" workflow is a clear 4-step sequence whose output format includes a verification summary ("2 of 2 stacks checked. 1 outdated."), but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop for API failures or stacks missing a version. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized sections (API Reference, Workflow, Output Format, Out of scope) and no need for external bundle files — meeting the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |