Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, executable workflow with preflight validation, explicit error feedback loops, and a concrete success criterion, all in a well-organized single file needing no external references. Minor repetition between the behavior and what-not-to-do sections keeps conciseness just below a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — preflight, git pointer commands, and the prompt template are given without padding — but sections like 'Calling agent behavior' and 'What not to do' repeat guidance already implied, slightly above the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, executable commands at every step (command -v/pulumi neo preflight, git rev-parse/status, mktemp, pulumi neo "$(cat …)") with a complete prompt template and explicit notes on broken alternative invocations. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 0–6 workflow with an explicit preflight validation checkpoint, error-handling feedback loops (preflight failure stops; non-zero CLI exit surfaces stderr and retains the file), and a defined success criterion (task URL echoed). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single self-contained file with no bundle directories and well-organized, navigable sections; per the rubric's simple-skill exception, a skill needing no external references scores 5 when sections are clearly organized. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |