CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

homelab-change-control

Control consequential homelab changes with explicit scope, observed-state evidence, approval, rollback, and non-secret records. Use before changing guests, services, storage, networking, access, backups, monitoring, or secrets.

72

Quality

90%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tightly written gate-keeping skill: lean, well-sequenced, with explicit validation and rollback checkpoints appropriate to consequential infrastructure changes. The only improvement space is providing a concrete example approval packet or command template to push actionability to fully executable.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean policy prose with no padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows; every section carries a directive ('stop on parameter drift, unexpected output, or a missing precondition'), so every token earns its place, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete instruction-level guidance throughout — seven enumerated approval categories, explicit stop conditions, exact record exclusions ('without credentials, raw environment exports, addresses, or private keys'), and a worked Representative Scenario — but no example approval packet or command template, so anchor 4 rather than fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence (Classify → Readiness Gate → Approval Gate → Execution and Evidence) with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops — 'Reconfirm volatile facts immediately before execution', 'Validate the exact success condition and protected-resource non-interference', and fresh approval before destructive rollback — matching anchor 5; the destructive-operation cap does not apply because validation is thorough.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is roughly 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references; its sections are well organized and the Routing section cleanly delegates details to sibling skills ('Use proxmox-service-guest-gate for fresh Proxmox guest creation and validation'), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a score of 5.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with a clear what/when split, third-person voice, and an explicit enumerated trigger clause. Trigger keywords are natural for the homelab domain; the only gaps are a few missing synonyms and slightly abstract action phrasing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete control mechanisms — 'explicit scope, observed-state evidence, approval, rollback, and non-secret records' — but these are governance actions rather than fully concrete operations, matching anchor 4 rather than the comprehensive coverage of anchor 5.

4 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' ('Control consequential homelab changes with explicit scope, observed-state evidence, approval, rollback, and non-secret records') and 'when' ('Use before changing guests, services, storage, networking, access, backups, monitoring, or secrets') with concrete trigger phrases, matching anchor 5.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Use before changing guests, services, storage, networking, access, backups, monitoring, or secrets' covers natural homelab phrasings well, though common synonyms like VM, containers, DNS, or Proxmox are absent, placing it at anchor 4 rather than 5.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

'Consequential homelab changes' carves a clear niche, but the broad change-oriented triggers could overlap with closely related sibling skills such as a change planner or safe-ops skill, matching anchor 4.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
pvnkmnk/AgenticSelfHostSkills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.