Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured, lean, and actionable with a clear sequenced workflow and a concrete template. The main gap is an explicit feedback loop tying a failed post-check to the rollback plan, which currently stays implicit.
Suggestions
Add an explicit error-recovery step, e.g. 'If post-check fails, execute the rollback plan from step 5, then re-run the post-check.'
Provide concrete criteria for the LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH risk rating (e.g. reversibility + blast radius thresholds) so step 4 is unambiguous.
Drop the redundant restatement of the description in the opening paragraph to tighten conciseness toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no concept over-explanation, but the opening paragraph restates the frontmatter description, a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | A concrete 9-step workflow plus a copy-paste Change Plan Template give mostly executable guidance, though a few steps (risk-rating criteria, dependency identification) remain high-level. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced with real checkpoints (state snapshot, approval gate, per-step confirmation, post-check), but the explicit error-recovery loop linking a failed post-check to the prepared rollback is only implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-organized skill under 50 lines with clear section headers and one-level external references (companion skills, a Proxmox doc URL), needing no bundle files. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |