Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-organized, single-purpose skill with a clear six-step workflow and thoughtful failure handling, scoring highly on conciseness and structure. Its main weakness is actionability: key steps (task list format, calendar mapping, checkbox setup) are described at a high level without a template, example output, or concrete mechanism, and there is no verification step after saving.
Suggestions
Add a short template or example snippet of the generated plan file (headings per phase, task checkbox format, milestone markers) so the output format is unambiguous.
Make "Map tasks to calendar with buffer time" concrete — e.g., specify Obsidian Tasks due-date syntax or a table format for the schedule.
Add a verification step after saving (e.g., confirm the file exists at Projects/Music/project-title.md and all phases have tasks) to close the workflow validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: each section (Purpose, Workflow Steps, Inputs, Outputs, Safety, Failure Modes) carries unique operational information with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (no "what is Obsidian" filler). This matches anchor 5 ('every token earns its place') — nothing to trim toward anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | There is some concrete guidance — the specific output path "Projects/Music/project-title.md", the named phase taxonomy (Concept, Production, Mixing, Mastering, Release, Promotion), and fallback behavior — but steps like "Generate task list per phase with estimated effort", "Map tasks to calendar", and "Set up progress checkboxes" lack a template, example plan format, or concrete mechanism (e.g., Obsidian Tasks syntax). It fits anchor 3 (some concrete guidance but incomplete, missing key details) rather than anchor 4's 'mostly executable with minor gaps'. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Six steps are clearly sequenced (Define → Phase → Tasks → Schedule → Save → Track), and the Failure Modes section supplies two explicit recovery paths ("prompt user to clarify before generating phases", "output plan as plain Markdown for manual paste"), which goes beyond anchor 3's 'checkpoints missing or implicit'. It falls short of anchor 5 because there is no validation that the saved plan is complete or the schedule feasible — a minor validation gap characteristic of anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill body is under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no bundle files needed (references/ and scripts/ contain only .gitkeep), and per the rubric guideline such skills score 5 with just well-organized sections. Sections are well organized, external links (Obsidian Tasks plugin, LANDR guide) are clearly signaled and one level deep, and nothing that belongs in a separate file is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |