Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, highly actionable review checklist that assumes Claude's competence and names exact APIs and patterns. It is well-organized and sequenced, with only minor workflow-feedback-loop gaps that are largely inapplicable to a review skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and packed with specific checks; it never explains concepts Claude already knows (no 'what is FastAPI/async' padding) and every bullet earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and directly executable — e.g. 'compare task.get_loop() against asyncio.get_running_loop()', 'mock via app.dependency_overrides[get_dependencies]', 'monkeypatch-delete the key', 'go through _safe_vault_path' — naming exact functions, env vars, and patterns; per scoring_notes, absence of code blocks in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is this actionable. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 'Review order' (1. Correctness → 2. Regressions → 3. Missing tests) provides an explicit checklist sequence with most checkpoints present; not a 5 because there is no explicit validate→fix→retry feedback loop, though such loops are largely inapplicable to a review skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references and four well-organized section headers, so per the simple-skill guideline progressive disclosure scores 5 on well-organized sections alone; no bundle files exist to verify. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |