CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

openclaw-pr-maintainer

Maintainer workflow for reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests and related issues. Use when Codex needs to validate bug-fix claims, search for related issues or PRs, apply or recommend close/reason labels, prepare GitHub comments safely, check review-thread follow-up, or perform maintainer-style PR decision making before merge or closure.

75

Quality

94%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A tight, highly actionable maintainer skill body with executable commands and explicit validation/confirmation gates for risky batch operations. Structure is clean; the only marginal gap is the absence of separate reference files for the longer policy sections.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean bullet-driven guidance that assumes Claude's competence; no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, and every line carries actionable policy or a concrete command.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides fully executable commands (e.g. 'gh search prs --repo openclaw/openclaw --match title,body --limit 50 -- "auto-update"', 'scripts/committer "<msg>" <file...>') plus concrete file paths covering the common maintainer cases.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The bug-fix evidence bar is a numbered sequence with explicit gating ('Never merge... require: 1. symptom evidence ... 4. a regression test'), and batch/destructive operations have validation checkpoints ('If a close or reopen action would affect more than 5 PRs, ask for explicit confirmation', 'Stop if rebase conflicts cannot be resolved safely').

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single well-organized SKILL.md with clear section headers and no nested references; cohesive policy content is appropriately inlined, though it runs beyond the simple-skill threshold and has no separate reference files to signal.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that covers both capabilities and explicit use-when triggers for a well-scoped maintainer task. Minor trigger-term naturalness keeps it just short of perfect.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete maintainer actions — 'reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests', 'validate bug-fix claims', 'apply or recommend close/reason labels', 'check review-thread follow-up' — giving comprehensive coverage.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Maintainer workflow for reviewing, triaging, preparing, closing, or landing OpenClaw pull requests') and when ('Use when Codex needs to validate bug-fix claims... before merge or closure') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural terms a maintainer would say ('pull requests', 'related issues or PRs', 'bug-fix claims', 'merge or closure'), but leans on specialized phrasing like 'maintainer-style PR decision making' and is scoped to 'Codex', missing a few common synonyms.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (OpenClaw PR maintainer workflow) with distinct, scope-specific triggers, making overlap with unrelated skills minimal.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

referenced_paths_exist

Referenced path issues: 1 missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
qsimeon/openclaw-engaging
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.