Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, highly actionable CLI-bridge skill with executable commands, a recovery table, and well-signaled external references; its only weaknesses are minor repetition across sections and a destructive --yolo mode that lacks an explicit validation checkpoint.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated 'plain-text only', '--grounded required', and exit-code-noise notes into a single canonical statement to tighten conciseness.
Add an explicit validation gate before --yolo (e.g. a confirmation check or a dry-run/--plan step) so the destructive variant has a real checkpoint.
Verify gotchas.md and ../x-shared/capability-loading.md resolve from the skill directory, and surface them as proper one-level links to firm up progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence (no 'what is a CLI' padding) with every section earning its place; it loses the 5 only because 'plain-text only', '--grounded required', and the exit-code noise caveat are each restated 2–3 times and could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands cover the common cases — 'agy-agent --grounded "Latest stable version of X?"', '--resume', '--add-dir', a complete env-var table, and an exit-code/recovery table — matching the 'fully executable, copy-paste ready' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Bootstrap → Quick Dispatch → Error Handling sequence with recovery feedback loops (auth → run interactively; timeout → raise AGY_TIMEOUT; quota → wait/switch model) sits at 'clear sequence with most checkpoints'; the destructive --yolo variant carries a DANGER gate but no hard validation checkpoint, keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references (gotchas.md, ../x-shared/capability-loading.md) and most content appropriately inline; no bundle files exist under references/scripts/assets, so it cannot reach the ideal 5 split, fitting 'good structure, minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |