Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A high-quality instruction-only skill: lean operational content, concrete examples and good/bad contrasts, a clearly sequenced workflow with a tracking feedback loop, and a single well-signaled real reference one level deep. It avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows and keeps every token actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense operational guidance Claude does not inherently know (the 6-section framework, blameless nuance, timed agenda, failure patterns) with no padding over familiar concepts; every section earns its place. Not scored below 3 because it does not explain what a postmortem is and stays lean despite its length. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly concrete for an instruction-only skill: a worked five-whys example, a four-factor causal chain, action-item criteria with good/bad contrasts ('Improve monitoring' vs 'Add alert on connection pool saturation, threshold 80%, page on-call'), and a copy-ready markdown output template with table headers. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 6-step Workflow (Schedule → Gather → Run meeting → Write → Distribute → Track) with a minute-budgeted agenda and an ownership rule ('the facilitator is not the scribe'), plus a feedback loop where unclosed action items re-surface in the next AAR. Not capped at 2 because the task is a retrospective process, not a destructive/batch/XML operation requiring validate-fix-retry checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized inline overview with a single clearly-signaled, one-level-deep reference to the real file references/aar-template.md (verified to exist), which offloads the fillable template. Not scored below 3 because navigation is explicit and references are exactly one level deep. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |