Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean framework with concrete examples, a sequenced workflow, and a verified external reference. It is highly actionable; only the fillable output template and modest feedback-loop structure keep it from full marks.
Suggestions
Add an explicit feedback loop in the workflow for failed or incomplete action items (e.g., track -> re-surface -> escalate) to strengthen workflow_clarity.
Consider moving the large output-format markdown template into the existing references/aar-template.md to reduce duplication and tighten the inline body.
Make the action-item table example concrete with realistic sample owner/due values to improve copy-paste actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; it assumes Claude's competence, never explaining what a postmortem is, and every section earns its place with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable with a worked five-whys example, a causal-chain example, and an action-item table with explicit criteria (Specific/Owned/Dated/Sized/Closeable); the output format is a fillable template rather than fully copy-paste-ready code, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 6-step sequence with a timeboxed agenda and explicit follow-through checkpoint ('Action items that don't close re-surface in the next AAR'); this is not a destructive/batch operation, so the validation cap does not apply, though explicit feedback loops are limited. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a well-signaled, verified one-level-deep reference (references/aar-template.md); most content is appropriately inline with minor organization gaps in the long output-format block. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |