Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable playbook with excellent progressive disclosure into verified reference files and a clear sequenced framework. Its main weakness is conciseness: the core framing is restated across several sections and the closing largely recapitulates earlier points.
Suggestions
Consolidate the vanity-calculator/lead-trap/transparent-decision-tool framing so it is defined once and only referenced elsewhere; remove the recapitulation in the closing section.
Cut repeated methodology-disclosure and tiered-value restatements (e.g. in the 12-considerations list and closing) since each already has a dedicated section pointing to a reference file.
Tighten the prose in 'Calculation logic transparency' and 'Result presentation' to directive bullets, since the surrounding paragraphs re-explain why trust matters.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~287-line body reiterates the vanity-calculator/lead-trap/transparent-decision-tool framing in the intro, a dedicated section, anti-patterns, common failures, and the closing, and restates methodology/tiered-value points multiple times; it is mostly efficient domain guidance but could be tightened well below the lean score-3 bar. It is not score 1 because the padding is repeated domain methodology rather than basic concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, copy-ready directives: named input types with when-to-use, four methodology-disclosure options with examples, named result-presentation patterns, a worked 3-tier B2B SaaS example, and a 12-point framework — going beyond the score-2 'some concrete guidance but incomplete'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The '12 considerations for calculator design' is an explicit ordered checklist from the calculator decision through lead-quality measurement, with earn/don't-invest decision criteria and a closing litmus test; this is a design/audit skill (not a destructive or batch operation), so the score-2 validation cap does not apply and the sequence-with-checklist matches the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that consistently pushes detail to one-level-deep reference files via 'Detail in references/...md' links plus a consolidated reference list, and all nine referenced files exist on disk; this matches the score-3 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' rather than the score-2 inline-wall case. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |