Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured skill body: a memorable 6-dimension framework with concrete component-specific accessibility and API guidance, a clear 10-step workflow, a useful failure-patterns section, and clean separation of detailed code patterns into three genuine reference files. Weaknesses are minor: a few bullets restate frontend basics Claude already knows, the body has no worked example, and the workflow lacks an explicit test→fix→retest loop.
Suggestions
Trim the 'Universal' accessibility bullets that restate basics Claude knows (semantic HTML, Tab/Shift+Tab navigation, typing props) and keep only the house rules like the 44px tap-target minimum.
Add an explicit feedback loop to the workflow after step 9 (e.g., 'If accessibility or keyboard tests fail: fix, then re-run — do not proceed to documentation until they pass').
Add in-context pointers to the reference files from their related sections (e.g., 'for ARIA code examples see references/accessibility-patterns.md' inside the Accessibility section) so readers find them before the end-of-file listing.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive ("Boolean props are red flags. Three booleans means seven combinations", "Children > props", "Skip any one and the component is incomplete") but includes a few bullets restating basics Claude already knows, e.g. "Semantic HTML elements (`<button>`, `<a>`, `<nav>`, `<form>`, etc.) over generic `<div>", "Keyboard navigable (Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter/Space for buttons)", and "Type the props. TypeScript or PropTypes or JSDoc." | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific guidance throughout — exact ARIA attributes ("`aria-describedby`", "`aria-invalid` when in error state", "`aria-live` so screen readers know something changed"), an enum example ("`variant: \"primary\" | \"secondary\" | \"ghost\"`"), and a prioritized test list — but the body itself contains no executable code or worked example, deferring code to the reference files, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 10-step workflow is clearly sequenced and step 9 ("Test. Automated accessibility, keyboard navigation, visual regression") plus "A component without at least automated accessibility testing is not done" provide a checkpoint, but there is no explicit test-fails→fix→retest feedback loop, and mid-workflow validation checkpoints are absent. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body keeps the framework overview inline (6 dimensions, workflow, failure patterns) and pushes detailed code patterns to three real, one-level-deep reference files, each clearly signaled with a description in the "Reference files" section — e.g. "[`references/component-api-patterns.md`](references/component-api-patterns.md) - Common patterns for designing flexible component APIs". | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |