CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

interactive-product-tour

Designing in-product tours, tooltips, and contextual help that teach product capabilities without becoming friction. Trigger logic, tour architecture, contextual placement, completion tracking. Honest about tooltip-spam (visual noise that users develop blindness to), one-and-done (help invisible at the moment of need), and contextual-when-needed (surfaces help at the moment friction occurs) patterns. Triggers on product tour, in-product tooltip, contextual help, walkthrough, feature tour, hint system, in-app guidance, tour platform. Also triggers when feature adoption is low, when users miss key product capabilities, or when an in-product help system is being scoped for the first time.

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured overview skill with excellent progressive disclosure (verified one-level-deep references that all exist) and actionable design guidance anchored by a litmus test and a 12-consideration framework. The main cost is repetition: the keystone three-pattern framing is restated four times across the body, which pads the token budget without adding guidance.

Suggestions

State the tooltip-spam / one-and-done / contextual-when-needed definitions once in the keystone section and only reference them by name elsewhere; the intro paragraph, 'The tours that work' paragraph, and closing currently restate them almost verbatim.

Compress the persona paragraph to a single line ('Voice: senior product marketing director — practical, opinionated about trigger logic, willing to say no tour is the right answer') to cut ~60 tokens of narrative.

Add a measure-and-iterate step to the framework (e.g., after shipping, instrument feature adoption for tour-covered features and re-audit triggers quarterly) to close the workflow's missing feedback loop and lift workflow clarity to 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient — no explaining of concepts Claude already knows — but the tooltip-spam / one-and-done / contextual-when-needed framing is restated nearly verbatim in four places (intro paragraph, 'The tours that work' paragraph, the keystone section, and the closing section), and the persona paragraph ('The voice is the senior product marketing director...') could be one line. Not a 4 because this repetition is more than minor over-explanation; not a 2 because the bulk is dense, useful pattern content.

3 / 5

Actionability

Concrete for an instruction-only skill: a litmus test procedure ('Watch a user encounter a feature for the first time...'), an explicit recommendation ('Most modern systems use the micro-tour library approach'), symptom-to-diagnosis failure mappings ('Audit trigger logic', 'rebalance to contextual triggers'), and a numbered 12-consideration checklist. Not a 5 because there are no worked examples — no sample trigger definition, tour spec, or metric threshold — that would make the guidance copy-paste ready.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequence is present: the tour decision explicitly comes first ('Before designing the tour system, decide whether tours are the right tool'), followed by trigger logic, architecture, placement, tracking, and differentiation, consolidated in the ordered 12-consideration framework with checkpoints like the litmus test and the failure-mode audit. Not a 5 because there is no explicit design-then-measure-then-adjust feedback loop (e.g., instrument adoption, verify lift, iterate).

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a genuine overview: each section summarizes the pattern and signals 'Detail in [references/X.md]', all 9 cited reference files exist and are one level deep, and a final Reference files section lists each with a one-line description. Matches the clear-overview, well-signaled-references anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

95%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: third-person voice, concrete domain coverage, explicit what-and-when structure, and a rich set of natural trigger terms with synonyms. The only weakness is that the enumerated capabilities read as topic labels rather than actions.

Suggestions

Convert the topical noun phrases ('Trigger logic, tour architecture, contextual placement, completion tracking') into concrete verb-led actions (e.g., 'Design trigger logic, structure tour architecture, place help contextually, instrument completion tracking') to lift specificity from 4 to 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete areas of work — 'Trigger logic, tour architecture, contextual placement, completion tracking' — plus the three named pattern framings (tooltip-spam, one-and-done, contextual-when-needed). Falls short of a 5 because after 'Designing in-product tours, tooltips, and contextual help' the items are topical noun phrases rather than multiple specific concrete actions.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ('Designing in-product tours, tooltips, and contextual help... Trigger logic, tour architecture, contextual placement, completion tracking') and when ('Triggers on...', 'Also triggers when feature adoption is low... an in-product help system is being scoped for the first time') with concrete trigger phrases. Not a 4 because the when-clause is explicit and specific rather than merely adequate.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'Triggers on product tour, in-product tooltip, contextual help, walkthrough, feature tour, hint system, in-app guidance, tour platform' provides comprehensive natural-term coverage with synonyms (product tour / feature tour, contextual help / in-app guidance), plus situational triggers ('feature adoption is low', 'users miss key product capabilities').

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche — in-product tours/tooltips/contextual help with lifecycle-scoped triggers — with distinct trigger terms unlikely to fire for adjacent skills (first-run wizards, conversational chatbots, documentation writing).

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository

rampstackco/claude-skills

Path

skills/interactive-product-tour/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.