product-configurator-design
Designing build-your-own product configurators (Tesla-style, custom-pricing, plan-builders) with constraint logic, real-time pricing, validation, and save-and-share mechanics. Honest about infinite-options (decision paralysis), canned-bundles-only (no real customization), and guided-configuration (smart defaults plus meaningful constraints plus escape hatches) patterns. Triggers on configurator design, build-your-own, custom configuration, plan builder, product customizer, configuration tool. Also triggers when users abandon mid-configuration, when configurator conversion is poor, or when a configurator is being scoped for the first time.
53
60%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/product-configurator-design/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong, well-crafted skill description that clearly defines a specific niche (product configurator design), lists concrete capabilities and design patterns, and provides both keyword-based and situational triggers. The description is comprehensive without being padded, uses third-person voice appropriately, and would be easily distinguishable from other skills in a large skill library.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions and concepts: constraint logic, real-time pricing, validation, save-and-share mechanics, smart defaults, escape hatches, and names specific patterns (infinite-options, canned-bundles-only, guided-configuration). | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (designing product configurators with constraint logic, pricing, validation, save-and-share) and 'when' (explicit 'Triggers on...' clause with keyword triggers and situational triggers like abandonment and poor conversion). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms: 'configurator design', 'build-your-own', 'custom configuration', 'plan builder', 'product customizer', 'configuration tool', plus situational triggers like 'abandon mid-configuration' and 'configurator conversion is poor'. The Tesla-style reference adds a recognizable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive niche focused specifically on product configurator design with clear domain-specific triggers. Unlikely to conflict with general UI/UX skills or pricing skills due to the specificity of 'configurator', 'build-your-own', and the named design patterns. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
20%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill reads as a thought-leadership essay about configurator design philosophy rather than an actionable skill for Claude. It is highly repetitive—the core thesis (guided-configuration > infinite-options or canned-bundles) is restated at least three times in full. The complete absence of concrete implementation guidance (no code, no schemas, no wireframe specs, no specific tool recommendations) makes it difficult for Claude to produce anything beyond the same conceptual advice the skill itself contains.
Suggestions
Cut content by at least 50%: remove the closing section (pure rehash), collapse the three-pattern explanation to one occurrence, remove the 'voice' description and audience paragraphs, and trim each section to its essential guidance.
Add concrete, actionable artifacts: include a JSON schema for configuration state, a code example for constraint logic evaluation, a sample pricing update payload, or a wireframe specification for the default-configuration view.
Replace abstract descriptions with executable examples: instead of 'Hard constraints: Option A and Option B are incompatible', show a constraint rule definition format and how it renders in the UI with specific copy.
Provide the referenced bundle files or remove the references—currently 9 files are referenced but none exist, making the progressive disclosure structure hollow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Extremely verbose. The content repeatedly restates the same concepts (infinite-options vs canned-bundles vs guided-configuration is explained at least 3 times). Extensive prose explaining concepts Claude already understands (what decision paralysis is, what bundles are, what real-time pricing means). The closing section rehashes everything already covered. The 'voice' paragraph and audience descriptions are unnecessary context. This could be cut by 60%+ without losing actionable content. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | No concrete code, commands, wireframe specs, or executable examples anywhere. Everything is abstract guidance and conceptual frameworks. There are no specific implementation patterns, no code snippets for constraint logic, no data schemas for configuration state, no API patterns for pricing updates. The skill describes what a configurator should do but never shows how to build one. The 12-consideration framework is a checklist of concepts, not actionable steps. | 1 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The 12-consideration framework provides a reasonable sequence for designing/auditing a configurator, and the common failure modes section offers diagnostic patterns. However, there are no validation checkpoints, no feedback loops, and no explicit 'do X then verify Y' sequences. The workflow is more of a conceptual checklist than a step-by-step process with verification gates. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill references 9 separate reference files with clear paths and descriptions, which is good structure. However, no bundle files were provided, so the references are unverifiable. The main file itself is very long with significant inline content that could have been pushed to references, and the inline content is repetitive rather than serving as a concise overview pointing to details. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 6 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
- Repository
- rampstackco/claude-skills
- Commit
8e70d03
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.