Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured methodology skill with concrete thresholds, a scoring formula, failure patterns, a defined output format, and clean one-level reference files. Its main gaps are mild redundancy of standard SEO concepts inline and the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow.
Suggestions
Trim the inline four-intent table to a one-line summary and defer the full taxonomy to references/intent-classification-guide.md, since Claude already knows the standard intent categories.
Add a validation checkpoint mid-workflow, e.g. after Stage 2: "Verify every keyword has an intent label before clustering; re-check ambiguous ones against the actual SERP."
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious heuristics (SERP-overlap rule, priority formula, quantified targets), but the four-intent taxonomy table and explanatory asides like "Get this right or the rest is noise" restate SEO knowledge Claude largely already has — minor over-explanation that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly executable instruction-only guidance: numeric targets (200–500 candidates, 20–50 clusters, 5–15 secondaries), a mechanical clustering rule ("share at least 3 of the top 10 results"), an explicit priority formula, a full output-column table, and a linked template — no significant gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step workflow is clearly sequenced with per-step quantified targets acting as checkpoints and a stated-gap policy for missing data, but there is no explicit verification step (e.g., confirming every keyword is intent-labeled before clustering), so it falls short of the validation/feedback-loop anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Both referenced files exist, are one level deep, and are clearly signaled (workflow step 8 and a "Reference files" section with per-file descriptions); intent detail and the output template are appropriately split out with only summaries kept inline. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |