CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

seo-technical

Run a comprehensive technical SEO audit covering crawlability, indexability, rendering, site architecture, structured data, page experience, security, and internationalization. Use this skill whenever the user asks about technical SEO, crawl issues, indexing problems, sitemaps, robots.txt, canonical tags, schema markup, page speed, Core Web Vitals, hreflang, redirects, or site-wide search performance. Triggers on technical SEO, site audit, crawlability, indexability, sitemap, robots.txt, canonical, redirect chain, schema, JSON-LD, Core Web Vitals, page speed, hreflang, mobile usability, HTTPS, security headers, render-blocking, JavaScript SEO. Also triggers when a site has indexing problems, traffic drops, or migration concerns, even if 'technical SEO' is not said explicitly.

75

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

87%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is lean, specific, and well-structured with excellent progressive disclosure via two real reference files. Its only meaningful gap is the absence of explicit verification checkpoints in the workflow, which keeps workflow clarity at the mid-level anchor.

Suggestions

Add an explicit verification step to the Workflow (e.g., step 8: re-crawl or re-check the affected URLs to confirm each fix resolved the issue before signing off), which would add the validation/feedback loop the rubric rewards.

Surface the migration-checklist.md reference earlier in the migration-relevant workflow steps (not only in the Reference files section) so the highest-risk scenario is discoverable at the point of use.

Consider noting a concrete validation command or check (e.g., Rich Results Test for schema, URL Inspection for rendering) within the relevant layer checklists to make verification actionable rather than implicit.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — each layer is a terse checklist (e.g., "Sitemap is present, returns 200, and lists canonical URLs only") with no padding explaining what robots.txt or canonical tags are, so every token earns its place.

3 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only audit skill it provides concrete, specific guidance with measurable thresholds and status codes ("returns 200", "3 clicks or fewer", "LCP, INP, CLS within thresholds", "404 pages return 404, not 200"), which per the rubric's instruction-skill note fully satisfies actionability despite the absence of code.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 7-step workflow is clearly sequenced with prioritization categories, but it lacks explicit validation or verification checkpoints (e.g., a re-crawl to confirm fixes resolved the issues), matching the anchor for steps present with validation gaps.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a concise overview that signals one-level-deep references to two real bundle files (audit-template.md and migration-checklist.md, both confirmed present) via clearly labeled links in the workflow and a dedicated Reference files section, with content appropriately split out.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it concisely states concrete capabilities, includes an extensive set of natural trigger terms, explicitly covers both what and when, and occupies a clear distinct niche. No substantive weaknesses to address.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete audit areas ("crawlability, indexability, rendering, site architecture, structured data, page experience, security, and internationalization") alongside the explicit action of running a technical SEO audit, matching the highest anchor for listing multiple specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does ("Run a comprehensive technical SEO audit...") and when to use it via explicit triggers ("Use this skill whenever the user asks about...", "Triggers on...", "Also triggers when a site has indexing problems, traffic drops, or migration concerns"), satisfying both what and when.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It provides broad natural-language terms users would say ("sitemap, robots.txt, canonical tags, schema markup, page speed, Core Web Vitals, hreflang, redirects") plus a second trigger list, giving good coverage without missing common variations.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The description carves out a clear niche (the technical layer beneath content) with specific, distinctive triggers unlikely to overlap with on-page, keyword, or competitor SEO skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
rampstackco/claude-skills
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.