Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and actionable with concrete paths and a clear single-page procedure. The only meaningful gap is the absence of an explicit post-write verification checkpoint and a slightly under-specified output template.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~35-line body is lean, avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, and every section (When to use, Inputs, Output, Rules, Procedure, Example prompt) earns its place with no padding. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete file paths, a specific hierarchy, numbered steps, and example triggers; as an instruction-only skill the absence of code is fine, but the output template (ASCII diagram, screenshot table) is sketched rather than fully specified, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence (load JSON -> inspect desktop then tablet/mobile -> write/update doc -> stop after one page) with an explicit stop boundary and an uncertainty rule, but it lacks an explicit verification step confirming the written doc is correct. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is under 50 lines, single-purpose, and cleanly organized into well-labeled sections, satisfying the under-50-lines exception for scoring 5 on progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |