Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured read-only status workflow with concrete git commands and a clear sequence. The only minor gap is the '<key phrase>' placeholder and a few descriptive rather than directly executable sub-bullets.
Suggestions
Replace the '<key phrase>' placeholder with a concrete hint for deriving the grep term (e.g., 'grep for the doc's slug, e.g. the rust-port-0001 token').
Add an example of the expected status-line format so the 'Show the status line' step is unambiguous.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — a one-line intro plus a numbered list — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place at the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable commands are given (e.g., 'git log --oneline --grep="rust-compiler" -10' and the path 'compiler/docs/rust-port/'), but the '<key phrase>' placeholder and descriptive sub-bullets ('Show the title', 'Note whether...') leave minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear, ordered 1-4 sequence with unambiguous sub-steps covers the read-only reporting task; no validation checkpoints are needed because nothing is mutated, so the destructive/batch cap does not apply and the simple-skill clarity standard is met. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized sections (heading + Instructions) and no need for external references, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure; no bundle files are present to verify. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |